Difference between revisions of "Post Aesthetics"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Post Aesthetics is a poser Facebook group which aims to be as hypocritical as possible under the guise of campaigning for social justice. It is led by a hypersensitive mod team which will ban for the slightest perceived offense, or often for absolutely no reason at all. Currently, the group has about 40,000 members. | Post Aesthetics is a poser Facebook group which aims to be as hypocritical as possible under the guise of campaigning for social justice. It is led by a hypersensitive mod team which will ban for the slightest perceived offense, or often for absolutely no reason at all. Currently, the group has about 40,000 members. | ||
| − | Most of the group's moderators seem live in the US and either attend college or are college educated. Post Aesthetics has a policy of not explaining its complex rules and social justice jargon well, instead telling people to research anything they don't understand | + | Most of the group's moderators seem live in the US and either attend college or are college educated. Post Aesthetics has a policy of not explaining its complex rules and large corpus of social justice jargon well, instead telling people to research anything they don't understand under constant threat of permanent ban. This is inherently biased against people who are less privileged than them, such as people from less developed countries and people with poorer educational backgrounds who have not been exposed to these ideas. |
In early May 2016, the head of Post Aesthetics seemingly attempted to cheat on his final project in an introductory AI class in exchange for unbanning a member. | In early May 2016, the head of Post Aesthetics seemingly attempted to cheat on his final project in an introductory AI class in exchange for unbanning a member. | ||
There are several Post Aesthetics shills on [[Cirque du Twerque]], and one or more "moles" who report negative things that CdT members say about Post Aesthetics to its numerous mods. These members appear to believe that Post Aesthetics is infallible because they agree with its stances on social justice, and despite widespread evidence of corruption and incompetence in its leadership, continue to defend the group. | There are several Post Aesthetics shills on [[Cirque du Twerque]], and one or more "moles" who report negative things that CdT members say about Post Aesthetics to its numerous mods. These members appear to believe that Post Aesthetics is infallible because they agree with its stances on social justice, and despite widespread evidence of corruption and incompetence in its leadership, continue to defend the group. | ||
Revision as of 04:45, May 19, 2016
Post Aesthetics is a poser Facebook group which aims to be as hypocritical as possible under the guise of campaigning for social justice. It is led by a hypersensitive mod team which will ban for the slightest perceived offense, or often for absolutely no reason at all. Currently, the group has about 40,000 members.
Most of the group's moderators seem live in the US and either attend college or are college educated. Post Aesthetics has a policy of not explaining its complex rules and large corpus of social justice jargon well, instead telling people to research anything they don't understand under constant threat of permanent ban. This is inherently biased against people who are less privileged than them, such as people from less developed countries and people with poorer educational backgrounds who have not been exposed to these ideas.
In early May 2016, the head of Post Aesthetics seemingly attempted to cheat on his final project in an introductory AI class in exchange for unbanning a member.
There are several Post Aesthetics shills on Cirque du Twerque, and one or more "moles" who report negative things that CdT members say about Post Aesthetics to its numerous mods. These members appear to believe that Post Aesthetics is infallible because they agree with its stances on social justice, and despite widespread evidence of corruption and incompetence in its leadership, continue to defend the group.
